In the midst of all the World Cup excitement the 2010 edition of the Tour de France has, at least its week, been lost amid a babble of hyperbolic sporting metaphors that I’m not sure the tournament ever lived up to. Don’t get me wrong; I’m under no illusion that the majority of fans who tuned in to see the final or any other match would have tuned in to coverage of the Le Tour had the Cup not been in progress. I’m also not benighted enough to think that someday professional cycling will rival football for affection in many hearts across the world. I even watched a fair bit of the tournament myself though I have to admit to switching between the final and Top Gear. Despite watching the overgrown adolescent Clarkson and his grinning sidekicks I was back in plenty of time to see the winning goal scored which was, I admit , pretty exciting though not nearly as invigorating as watching England beat Germany in 2001 on a big screen in a somewhat dodgy pub off the Mile End Road. Spain’s winning goal also wasn’t nearly as exciting as this year’s edition of the Tour has been so far.
Before the race started I was a bit wary. After the intense excitement of the
Giro d’Italia earlier this year I didn’t think it likely that the French race could offer fans as much. Sure, the Tour is the stage race and the director and his staff had planned this year’s route to ensure maximum excitement, but I just didn’t see how it could match the spectacle provided by its Italian cousin. Nine and a bit stages in (stage ten is underway as I write) I’m happy to report that I was wrong. So far la grande boucle has provided more than enough thrills and drama to keep me hooked and hungry for more. Elsewhere on the web and in print there’s plenty of strategic and statistical analysis of the race. This stuff is useful to understanding what’s going on, but I think it’s only interesting because the race itself has been great to watch. With this in mind I offer readers of the Omphaloskeptic some of my subjective reasons for taking such delight in the 2010 Tour so far
The Contador Armstrong rivalry - I might as well get this out of the way to begin with as it seems to impossible to watch or read any coverage without encountering some mention of it. Beyond the question of Armstrong’s age, the allegations of doping and his 7 victories I’ve always found myself reacting against what I see as his incredible egotism and megalomania as well as the attention that is lavished (and forced) on him. He started better than I expected him to and it would have been an incredible story to watch him battle it out with Contador all the way to Paris. That being said his horrible luck and, in stage 8, apparent lack of fitness have put him outside of contention for a podium place and let a breath of fresh air not so much into the field as into discussions of the race. While it would be amazing if he did claw back the minutes he’s lost I think it’s only good for the race that the rivalry between Armstrong and the Spaniard has already been put to bed. This makes it easier to hear, read and talk about the numerous other stories and riders worthy of attention. One Schleck brother, for example, has been forced to abandon due to crash-sustained injuries while his younger sibling, who many agreed depended heavily upon him, seems poised to give Contador more of a contest than most expected. My point isn’t that Armstrong versus Contador wasn’t worthy of attention just that it risked overshadowing a much wider range and greater depth of stories.
The Three C’s:
- Crashes – I hope everyone reading this is shaking his or her head in shock. The crashes are horrible, they leave my mouth dry and give me a definite feeling of nausea. As someone who cycles I can’t bear to watch them; they are nightmares played out on my screen. It’s their aftermath, how the riders respond to their spills that is important for reasons in common with the other two C’s which I’ll get to in a moment. I do not watch the race to see crashes for their own sake and it would make me very happy if there were no more crashes this year or in future Tours.
- Cobbles – I loved the cobbled sections early on in this year’s Tour. The riders rode aggressively and there were some surprises as well as crashes
- Climbs – the past few stages have seen the Tour entering the alps and forced the riders to do some real climbing. I love watching both the pure climbers who seem to dance gracefully up first and hors category climbs and the bigger guys who force their way up the slopes with brute force. Cycling up and over a mountain is a silly thing to do when you think about it. It’s even sillier to do it more than once in a day. The grimpeurs and the grunters negate that silliness and give us something beautiful.
What the crashes, cobbles and climbs all share is an ability to make it clear just how hard the riders of the Tour are working, how close to the edge they push themselves just for the sake of a gruelling contest that sees them ride over 1oo miles daily for three weeks apart from two rest days. The cobbles demanded aggressive riding and a clear commitment on the part of all those who crossed them and even that wasn’t enough to keep everyone safe or within sight of a podium place. The climbs, even for the best climbers, are a visible display of an ability to deal with physical pain and carry on. For some that’s through a stubborn refusal to give up, for others it’s a more graceful exercise that sees them ‘play’ with other climbers as they chase and accelerate away from fellow riders as they climb. In both cases the determination, dedication and strength of the competitors is on show something that is also true, perhaps to a greater extent, when riders pick themselves up after a crash, get back on their bikes or one of their teammates’ and carry on despite road rash, the need for stitches and worse. Then, where possible, they come back the next day and continue racing. Cadel Evans, for example, took the yellow jersey and completed the next day’s stage with a broken elbow. Like many others watching I thought he’d simply run out of steam when he was dropped from the main peloton and saw his chances of an overall win disappear. It never occurred to me or the commentators I was listening to that he might have a broken bone in one of the arms that had been supporting his upper body weight on his bars all day. It’s a horrible thing to contemplate doing.
It also, I think, says something eloquent about not just Evans, but the race as a whole. As a stage race the Tour de France is a daily grind for those who contest it. It’s a punishing ordeal for their bodies and minds that demands strength and skill. It can, and often does, exact a blood tribute from its participants. From that daily slog, from the mixture of dust, sun, mud, rain, grease and blood that is le Tour something dramatic, strong, graceful and, yes, beautiful emerges. The race is self-contradictory. It can be hard to watch. At the same time, once you see it for what it is it’s even harder not too. . .